Photo by dlxmedia.hu on Unsplash. Source: https://unsplash.com/photos/person-working-on-a-laptop-with-a-cup-of-coffee-rqMWNKRLVuw (Unsplash License).

Migration math settles more VMware exits than feature grids do. Buyers who compare license lines alone answer the wrong question. Three-year totals, labor and risk included, is the only number that decides it.

  • The middle path looks cheap and rarely is, because you pay for two platforms at once during the overlap.
  • A full exit pencils out only when you plan past year three and accept the operational risk of running it yourself.
  • CloudBolt’s survey of 302 IT decision makers found 86 percent are reducing VMware slowly, workload by workload.

Read the full VMware exit cost model.

The economics behind this migration wave, including the three year cost model and why exits run long, are in the 2026 State of Enterprise Infrastructure report.

By Ivan Tarin

Ivan Tarin is a Principal Product Marketing Manager at SUSE, where he owns go-to-market strategy and positioning for a seven-product cloud-native portfolio spanning Kubernetes, virtualization, storage, security, and observability. A former full-stack developer who shipped production code for enterprise and public-sector clients including U.S. national laboratories, Ivan translates complex infrastructure and AI technology into messaging that lands with developers, platform teams, and enterprise buyers. He has presented at KubeCon, SUSECON, and AWS Developer Week, and is currently pursuing an MS in Artificial Intelligence at the University of Colorado Boulder.

One thought on “The Year Your VMware Exit Math Goes Wrong”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get the next one before it is old news

Independent analysis of cloud-native infrastructure, Kubernetes and data centre economics. No vendor spin.